Dell XPS 13 Plus Review: This Slim Premium Laptop Isn't Afraid to Shake Things Up



Dell XPS 13 Plus Review: This Slim Premium Laptop Isn't Afraid to Shake Things Up





When you open up the XPS 13 Plus, three things will immediately strike you as... current. Those design choices make the XPS 13 Plus heinous out so much visually, but they also make for an unconventional known. Not necessarily a bad one, but certainly one that battles years of laptop design muscle memory. 


First is the touchpad, which sits, disguised, along the edge-to-edge palm rest. It's there, but you can't actually see it. The touch-sensitive part of that principal area is indistinguishable from the part you just rest your attractive on. 






































































Apple laptops peaceful have a distinct panel for touch, some laptops from Dell's own Alienware line have touchpads that literally glow in different colors, but here it's guesswork. In practice, however, I fake the touch-sensitive area relatively easy to use. It runs from the left edge of the spacebar on one side to the gleaming edge of the Alt key on the other. Sure, it would be cool to have the touchpad run the entire along of the body, but that would be a nightmare for palm rejection AI and probably not as useful as you'd think.





Like









  • Inventive new design







  • Very slim and light







  • Excellent performance







  • Great OLED display







  • Included USB-C dongles




Don't Like









  • You noteworthy not love the new touchpad, keyboard and function keys







  • Underwhelming battery life







  • Heat and fan noise







  • Low-resolution webcam







  • No headphone port





But the larger display remains -- people are used to how touchpads work and what they look like, so you mess with that public experience at your own peril. In this case, the touchpad's overall feel is good for a Windows laptop, but it could also feel either too sensitive or not sensitive enough, depending on what I was doing. The best word for an overall vibe would be "floaty," and it suffers in comparison by arriving on my desk immediately after the latest MacBook Air, which is the platonic ideal of touchpad feel and functionality. 


Dell creates a big deal of the haptics of the touchpad. It feels like you can click it down, but it's not actually depressing. MacBook touchpads have worked the same way for ages. Personally, I'm a tapper, not a clicker, so it didn't make a huge difference to me. 




xps13-4.png



The invisible touchpad. 




Dan Ackerman



Next is the keyboard, which ditches the standard island-style keys -- flat with a just space between each one -- for an edge-to-edge invent, where each key brushes up against its neighbor. It's a style that popped up occasionally in the 2010s, but one I haven't seen in a while. It lets you funds a larger top surface for each key and in some cases, helps make a laptop thinner. I got used to it rapid but, again, my muscle memory fought it. It also lacks the satisfying snap of a good island-style keyboard. 


The last big changeable is to the Function key row. It reminds me of the now-deprecated Apple Touch Bar, as it's a backlit row of touch-sensitive icons. The believe and system commands are lit by default -- brightness, volume, keyboard backlight and so on. Hold the Fn key and you see the typical F1 to F12 keys. You can swap the behaviors the other way if you prefer. 


Why do this? Again, I believe it's to shave some thickness from the systems and allow for its hinge mechanism. I'm not alongside the idea in principle, but the MacBook Pro's above go of it shows that people aren't itching to swap brute buttons for virtual ones. And this isn't a full-color user-assignable OLED cloak strip like Apple's version, either. But in the end, the only pulling I think you'll miss is having a physical Esc key, which can be important in your day to day use. I favorite how clear the icons were and how they were boldly backlit. 




xps13-6.png



Function keys are replaced by a mopish strip. 




Dan Ackerman



Configuration and performance


Once you put keep those three breaks with laptop design orthodoxy, the rest of the XPS 13 Plus is a old-fashioned and mostly excellent premium 13-inch laptop experience. The XPS 13 line has always been one of my accepted Windows laptops, and this looks and feels like a high-end machine that will be a conversation allotment whenever you whip it out. 


The XPS 13 Plus starts at $1,299 and the model I tested is today $1,949. It includes an upgraded CPU, RAM and indicate. I liked that there are four 13.4-inch screen options, both OLED and LCD, ranging from a 1,920x1,080 non-touch cloak to a 3,840x2,400 touchscreen.


Inside, the version here has a 12th-gen Intel Core i7-1280P, and all the engineering to squeeze it into this 15mm-thick body is impressive. That said, the fans spin up audibly, sometimes sounding like a minor white noise machine in the background, and even then, the systems got very warm, especially on the bottom panel. 




xps13-3.png



Dan Ackerman



Performance with that 12th-gen Core i7 is a highlight, and it's nice to have this much raw horsepower in a high-design, executive-class laptop. I've compared it to Apple's latest mainstream and Pro laptops, as well as comparable Windows systems. It's part of Intel's Evo program, which is a designation for premium slim laptop designs with good performance. If you go with the least expensive configuration, you get a Core i5 from the same generation. 


In the preloaded My Dell app, you can switch between performance presets (navigate from My Dell > Power > Thermal). The Performance mode was indeed faster, but also cranked the fans up even more, manufactured a lot of heat, and certainly didn't help the already limp battery life. 


Display and webcam 


The indicate is also a highlight. I tested the 3,456x2,160-pixel touchscreen version, which is an impressive-looking OLED panel. Dell calls this 3.5K and you can also get a true 4K version, but that's no OLED panel. Either one is a $300 upgrade from the base non-touch Full HD 1,920x1,080-pixel model. There's also a FHD touch panel for $100 more, and if you're looking to cut injuries, it's probably where I'd go. On a relatively dinky laptop, you can get away with FHD resolution, but adding mopish is going to be valuable. 


I'm less pleased with the 720p webcam. Premium laptops have made a major switch to FHD cameras in the past combine of years, even dragging long-time holdout Apple in with the another MacBook Air Dell says the lower-res camera here benefits from image processing help on the software side, but I untrue it to be merely ok. Jumping into a Zoom unites in low light, I had a distinct orange hue. Adding a higher-resolution camera would liable mean a thicker lid, so I get that there's a size-versus-functionality tradeoff. 




win-20220808-14-20-00-pro



A tall webcam, this is not. 




Dan Ackerman



The camera is also used for Dell's presence-detection features, which I find interesting. It can wake from sleep mode when the camera detects your face, or it can lock itself when you walk away. But the feature I favorite most was called Look Away Detect, which will dim the cloak if it sees you looking away. That's good for both battery life and privacy, and worked so well that I think more laptops necessity have a feature like that. 


It has just two Thunderbolt USB-C ports, which is frankly fine for most people these days, and it matches the most unusual 13-inch MacBook Pro. But, Dell kills the headphone jack, which grand be rarely used, but is a notable exclusion however. A USB-C-to-audio dongle is included in the box, as is a USB-C-to-USB-A one. That's a nice bonus, and one that some companies (ahem, Apple...) would probably make you pay wonderful for. The downside is, if you keep it plugged into grand and use the headphone adaptor at the same time, you're out of ports. 


Battery life and roadworthiness 


Despite focusing on some of the novel design choices and limitations, there's a lot I love approximately the XPS 13 Plus. I love a sharp, novel design and am willing to trade a little familiarity to push the vows a bit. This level of performance in a slim, scrumptious laptop like this is enviable (as long as we're sticking on the non-dedicated GPU side of things), and the hidden performance modes offer more flexibility than I'm used to seeing in contrast laptops. 


But there's one more wrinkle in the formula. Battery life. In benchmark testing, the XPS 13 Plus ran on the mopish side, at about 4 hours while streaming online video, which is far from the most strenuous thing you grand ask it to do. In hands-on use, it felt a minor better depending on what I was doing, but it also dropped from almost 70% to understanding 30% in less than 2 hours while I was writing this review. 




xps13-5.png



Ports are exiguous, but dongles are included. 




Dan Ackerman



Use the optimized performance preset, turn down the screen brightness, close unused apps and you can liable push the battery life to a better place. But I don't feel confidential that I could pick up this laptop in the morning and work on it all day minus charging. It helps that there's an express charging preset for powering up part of the battery quickly. 


The nearly 4K cloak doesn't do the battery any favors, although the fact that it's an OLED panel necessity help. That's one reason I'm cautious about recommending 4K laptops -- higher-resolution screens are a battery killer. 


The XPS 13 Plus has a lot of innovative ideas -- some of which are important, while others seem like change for the sake of mopish. We may even disagree on which is which. If I were toiling on the next generation of this laptop, I'd keep the develop updates but suggest sacrificing a little thickness for a bigger battery so this could be a more travel-ready companion. 




Geekbench 5 (multicore)





Acer Swift 5 (SF514-56T-797T)




Lenovo Yoga 9i (14-inch, Gen 7)




Apple MacBook Air (13-inch, M2, 2022)




Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320




Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED





Note:


Longer bars point to better performance





Cinebench R23 (multicore)





Acer Swift 5 (SF514-56T-797T)




Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320




Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED




Lenovo Yoga 9i (14-inch, Gen 7)




Apple MacBook Air (13-inch, M2, 2022)





Note:


Longer bars point to better performance





3DMark Wild Life Extreme





Apple MacBook Air (13-inch, M2, 2022)




Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320




Lenovo Yoga 9i (14-inch, Gen 7)




Acer Swift 5 (SF514-56T-797T)




Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED





Note:


Longer bars present better performance





Online streaming battery drain test





Apple MacBook Air (13-inch, M2, 2022)




Lenovo Yoga 9i (14-inch, Gen 7)




Acer Swift 5 (SF514-56T-797T)





Note:


Longer bars present better performance





System Configurations



























Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320

Windows 11 Home; 1.8GHz Intel Core i7-1280P; 16GB DDR5 6,400MHz RAM; 128MB Intel Iris Xe Graphics; 512GB SSD

Apple MacBook Air (13-inch, M2, 2022)

MacOS Monterey 12.4; Apple M2 8-core chip; 8GB RAM; Apple 10-core GPU; 256GB SSD

Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED

Windows 11 Pro; 2.7 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U; 16GB DDR5 ; 6,400MHz; 512MB AMD Radeon Graphics; 1TB SSD

Acer Swift 5 (SF514-56T-797T)

Windows 11 Home; 1.8GHz Intel Core i7-1280P; 16GB DDR5 6,400MHz RAM; 128MB Intel Iris Xe Graphics; 512GB SSD

Lenovo Yoga 9i (14-inch, Gen 7)

Windows 11 Home; 2.1GHz Intel Core i7-1260P; 16GB DDR5 5.200GHz RAM; 128MB Intel Iris Xe Graphics; 512GB SSD




How we test computers


The reconsideration process for laptops, desktops, tablets and other computer-like devices consists of two parts: performance testing conception controlled conditions in the CNET Labs and extensive hands-on use by our permission reviewers. This includes evaluating a device's aesthetics, ergonomics and features. A final review verdict is a combination of both those impartial and subjective judgments. 


The list of benchmarking software we use shifts over time as the devices we test evolve. The most important core demonstrations we're currently running on every compatible computer include: Primate Labs Geekbench 5, Cinebench R23, PCMark 10 and 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra. 


A more detailed description of each benchmark and how we use it can be counterfeit in our How We Test Computers page.