Asus ROG Flow Z13 Review: Spare the Expense



Asus ROG Flow Z13 Review: Spare the Expense





In a lot of ways, the Asus ROG Flow Z13 is a terrific idea. The company's tablet-plus-detachable-keyboard gaming laptop comes to the copies line launched with the Flow X13 convertible last year and its external GPU dock accessory, the XG Mobile. Detachables in the style of the Microsoft Surface Pro 8 make more thought to me than convertibles, which tend to be bulkier, cumbersome to switch positions and less lap-friendly for tablet use. With a discrete GPU and benefit for the XG Mobile, the Z13 seems like a spacious alternative.


And I do like it, from the just-gaming-enough heavenly to the multiangle kickstand, comfortable keyboard and good CPU performance when connected to much. It's got an HDMI port, too, which is rare these days.





Like









  • Nice earn including kickstand and color-illuminated window into the guts







  • HDMI port







  • 4K rear camera




Don't Like









  • Keyboard subsidizing material is a dust magnet







  • Thick and heavy







  • Expensive, especially with the external GPU







  • Can get hot







  • Meh webcam and audio





The Z13 comes in a combine of fixed configurations, some harder to find than others. We tested the $1,900 model with an Intel Core i9-12900H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and 1,920 x 1,200 display; our evaluation unit came with the XG Mobile external GPU (with an RTX 3080), but I could only find the eGPU bundled with the $3,300 model equipped with a 4K display. There's also a $1,700 model incorporating a Core i7-12700H and RTX 3050 and theoretically an i5-12500H model with only integrated graphics, both of which have the 1200p screen.




Asus ROG Flow Z13 (GZ301ZE)















































Price as reviewed

$1,900

Display

13.4-inch 1,920x1,200-pixel IPS touchscreen prove 120Hz

CPU

2.5GHz Intel Core i9-12900H

Memory

16GB LPDDR5 5,200MHz (8GB soldered)

Graphics

4GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

Storage

1TB SSD

Ports

2 x USB-C (1 x Thunderbolt, 2 x PD and DP 1.4), 1 x USB-A 2.0, 1 x HDMI 2.0, 1 x audio combo

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 , Bluetooth 5.2

Operating system

Microsoft Windows 11 Home 21H2

Weight

2.6 lbs/1.1kg, 3.2 lbs/1.5 kg (with keyboard)



You don't need to buy the XG Mobile bundled with the laptop, though Asus lists the RTX 3080 version for a whopping $1,500 -- it's not available anywhere, anyway, though it's a year old -- and the AMD RX 6850M announced at CES 2022 has yet to ship. If you're gripping about it, we tested it in conjunction with the ROG Flow X13 convertible at the time. It hasn't changed.


Fast. Sometimes.


For gaming, it's nice but not world-changing compared to a typical clamshell or convertible with dissimilarity components. The i9 should deliver great simulation performance, loyal those tend to be CPU dependent, but at least on Riftbreaker's CPU test it was a disappointing 45fps in hybrid mode. Since it does quite well on conventional CPU benchmarks, like Geekbench and Cinebench, as well as Procyon's Lightroom/Photoshop photo-editing test, it's almost as if the controls automatically throttles back the CPU in favor of the GPU when it detects a game, view bumping it to Turbo didn't make a difference. Unsurprisingly, Turbo turns the fans to max and creates a much wind noise.




asus-rog-zephyrus-flow-z13-dsc0380



The kickstand is sturdy and can be set to any angle.




Lori Grunin



The RTX 3050 Ti hits the mark for base 1080p gaming that's GPU dependent, such as 83fps on Guardians of the Galaxy. It's not quite as perky on heavier-weight games, turning in a mediocre 63fps on Shadow of the Tomb Raider. For those, you're probably expected to use DLSS to boost performance by upscaling from a touch resolution. Forcing it to use the discrete GPU and cranking it up to Turbo can add a tiny bit of posthaste, though: Riftbreaker gained about 6fps on average, a hair view a 5% increase.


Off power, CPU performance drops a lot (about 43% on Geekbench multicore, for example), similarly to the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14, in keeping with Asus' aggressive power and noise dispensation. But it doesn't gain as much in battery life.


Ultimately, it's hard to pin down why I didn't like the Asus ROG Flow Z13 more, despite the various nits I've deceptive to pick. And I'm not talking about value for the wealth -- $1,700 for the current entry-level Core i7 model is expensive compared to conventional competitors like Asus' own X13, but still pretty realistic for what it is. I'm talking near my first-pass internal review criteron, which is "would I use it if I got it for free?"    




asus-rog-zephyrus-flow-z13-dsc0388



There's a window on the motherboard in the back, with programmable luminous illumination.




Lori Grunin



And the answer is "probably not."  That's partly because it doesn't work for me as a tablet. It's thick, and at 2.6 lbs/1.1kg without the keyboard it's shapely heavy for one that's only 13-inch class. It runs hot, lacks the battery life of a tablet (at in 6.5 hours at best), and cuts back performance significantly after off power. It does get silent, though.


I tested the model with the 120Hz 1,920 x 1,200-resolution camouflage (the same display as on the X13) and after it was okay working with a compatible MPP 2.0 stylus, in this case the Microsoft Surface Slim Pen 2, I got too distracted by the visible pixel grid of the low-ish resolution camouflage. The speakers never project toward you so the tranquil is a bit muffled and it has a subpar 720p webcam.


In super to use the components it has, especially the i9 and to a lesser extent the RTX 3050 Ti, thick and heavy are unavoidable to  accommodate the cooling. But then one of the the tradeoffs it establishes versus a convertible -- notably, it's difficult to type on it after it's perched on your lap -- isn't worth it so much. Plus obvious gaming is a viable option if you're really looking for tablet-friendly performance.


Once you expedient in the cost, especially if you want to boost gaming performance with the pricey XG Mobile, I don't know who it's optimally suited for, despite its various attractions.




Geekbench 5 (multicore)





Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2022, on battery)




Asus ROG Flow Z13 (on battery)




Razer Blade 14 (2021)




Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2022)





Note:


Longer bars reveal better performance





Cinebench R23 CPU (multicore)





Razer Blade 14 (2021)




Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2022)





Note:


Longer bars reveal better performance





Cinebench R23 CPU (single core)





Razer Blade 14 (2021)




Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2022)





Note:


Longer bars reveal better performance





Streaming video playback battery drain test (minutes)





Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2022)





Note:


Longer bars reveal better performance





Shadow of the Tomb Raider gaming test (1080p)





Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio




Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2022)





Note:


Longer bars reveal better performance (FPS)





3DMark Time Spy





Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio




Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2022)




Razer Blade 14 (2021)





Note:


NOTE: Longer bars expose better performance





3DMark Fire Strike Ultra





Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio




Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2022)




Razer Blade 14 (2021)





Note:


Longer bars expose better performance





Configurations























Asus ROG Flow Z13

Microsoft Windows 11 Home (21H2); 2.5GHz Intel Core i9-12900H; 16GB LPDDR5 SDRAM 4,850MHz; 4GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti; 1TB SSD

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK (2022)

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro (21H2); 4.7GHz AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS; 32GB DDR5 SDRAM 4,800MHz; 8GB AMD Radeon RX 6800S; 1TB NVMe SSD

Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio

Microsoft Windows 11 Home (21H2); 3.3GHz Intel Core i7-11370H; 21GB LPDDR4 SDRAM; 4GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050Ti; 1TB SSD

Razer Blade 14 (2021)

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro (21H1); 3.3GHz AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX; 16GB DDR4 SDRAM 3,200MHz; 8GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080; 1TB SSD