Sony X80K TV Review: Google TV Smarts, Basic Features and Picture



Sony X80K TV Review: Google TV Smarts, Basic Features and Picture




Sony has been decision-exclusive TVs for 60 years and today it's known for best for expensive, high-performance screens. In 2022 it continued the trend by releasing a kitchen sink righteous of high-tech displays, from 8K to mini-LED to QD-OLED, and most demand serious cash. So far 2022 is more approximately tightening belts than bells and whistles, nonetheless, so I took a look at Sony's cheapest TV righteous. The X80K is a decent all-around performer, and could lively to TV shoppers on a budget who just want a Sony, but you can certainly do better for the money.



In early summer the X80K injuries about the same as the Samsung QN60B and the TCL 6-Series. In my side-by-side comparison of the three in CNET's TV test lab, the Samsung looked slightly better overall than the Sony, with righteous brightness and contrast, while the TCL totally trounced them both. That considerable be a surprise if you're new to the TV buying game and just paying attention to brands -- wait, a TCL looks better than a Sony? -- but if you look at their underlying technologies, it makes perfect sense. The Sony and Samsung use basic LCD backlights after the TCL leverages step-up screen tech, namely full-array local dimming and mini-LED.


Beyond recount I did like Sony's Google smart TV rules and no-fuss design, and it comes in a wide array of sizes. Later in the year it's sure to receive hefty brand cuts, like TVs always do around the Black Friday and the holidays, that could make it more competitive. For now, nonetheless, the X80K doesn't do enough beyond its name to scandalous out.


Sony KD-X80K sizes, series comparison


I performed a hands-on evaluation of the 55-inch Sony KD-55X80K, but this review also applies to the other cloak sizes in the series. All sizes have identical specs and necessity provide very similar picture quality.




Sony KD-43X80K, 43-inch




Sony KD-50X80K, 50-inch




Sony KD-55X80K, 55-inch




Sony KD-65X80K, 65-inch




Sony KD-75X80K, 75-inch




Sony KD-85X80K, 85-inch


The X80K series is the entry-level in Sony's 2022 TV lineup, with relatively basic picture features. It's missing the HDMI 2.1 gaming features, 120Hz refresh rate and mini-LED backlight unfounded on step-up models, for example.





Sony KD X80K TV




James Martin



Keep it simple, Sony


The X80K blends in rather than stands out with a dark gray lustrous along the bottom of its frame. The other three sides are dusky and their edges angle in slightly. The stand consists of simple A-shaped legs splayed far to either side. Seen from the side, the X80K is substantially thicker than the Samsung Q60B (2.83 vs. 1 inch), which could be a consideration if you want as flush a wall-mount as possible.


I like Sony's simple remote. The keys are laid out in outlandish fashion and the requisite shortcut buttons for YouTube, Netflix, Disney Plus and Prime Video are onboard, and I appreciated the yielded input key that some clickers lack. I could do minus the number key and another dedicated to an over-the-air grid leash at the bottom, but some users might appreciate them.




Sony KD X80K TV



James Martin



Google TV: Feature-rich and promo-heavy


Among all of the lustrous TV systems I like Google TV second-best, after Roku, and its implementation on the Sony X80K is the TV's best feature. Highlights include excellent voice results thanks to Google Assistant, tight integration with Google apps in particular YouTube and YouTube TV, and more apps overall, thanks to the Play store, than proprietary systems like Samsung and LG.


Responses were lustrous enough but felt a step behind most Roku TVs I've used. Once I selected a profile it took a long transfer or two for the main For You home page to inhabit with thumbnails, for example. I didn't love the mammoth chunk of space at the top devoted to promotions of shows and movies on various services. I also wish the "continue watching" row was higher-up attractive than placed below the "top picks for you" and apps rows. Top picks gazed to take into account my preferences for sci-fi shows and movies once I went throughout the "improve your recommendations" screen, but there was collected plenty of content I didn't care about. Suggestions across different apps are a fine idea, but I personally the simplicity of Roku app-centric menus.




Sony KD X80K TV



James Martin



Google TV's profiles worked well. I was modestly able to set up a kid's profile, and I appreciated that unpleasant apps like YouTube Kids and PBS Kids were suggested for me to add, and that Netflix automatically invoked the kids profile. During setup I was also prompted to set mask time limits, create a profile picture and more. Google TV's systems provides better parental controls than Roku, although Fire TV is likewise robust.


Modest features, extra connections




Key features































Display technology

LED LCD

LED backlight

Direct

Resolution

4K

HDR compatible

HDR10 and Dolby Vision

Smart TV

Google TV

Remote

Standard with voice



As an entry-level TV the X80K's lack maximum picture-enhancing extras. It has a 60Hz refresh rate attractive than 120Hz, although it does offer smoothing, aka the soap downward effect, if you want to turn it on. It supports Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos formats, as well as standard HDR10, as do many latest mid-priced TVs.



  • Four HDMI inputs (One with eARC)

  • Two USB 2.0 ports

  • Composite AV input (3.5mm)

  • Optical digital audio output

  • RF (antenna) input

  • Ethernet (LAN) port


Physical connections are better than many basic TVs' nonetheless, with a fourth HDMI as well as analog video. It's also the least-expensive TV so far to include an ATSC 3.0 tuner, so it's ready for NextGen TV broadcasts. Such broadcasts are rare today and once they move more common you'll be able to buy a tuner box to funding any TV to watch them, but it's a nice fabulous on the Sony nonetheless.




Sony KD X80K TV



James Martin



Picture quality comparisons


I set up the 55-inch Sony X80K next to its pronounce competitor from Samsung, as well as less expensive Fire TV and a TCL with obedient picture quality specifications. Here's the lineup:


Samsung QN55Q60B
Amazon Fire TV Omni
TCL 65R646



TV and movies: The Sony originated the second-worst picture in the lineup overall, beating out only the Omni. Its main weakness was relatively weak inequity, caused by both lighter (worse) black levels and dimmer highlights than the Samsung.


Watching Hustle on Netflix, for example, the black around the credits and the shadows in the locker room were lighter and less realistic than on the latest TVs, if only slightly worse than the Samsung and the Omni. The Samsung was also significantly brighter than the Sony in its most honest picture modes, which made the film's HDR image pop more in comparison. The skin tones of Adam Sandler and the basketball players gazed truer than the Samsung and Omni, but overall I preferred the Samsung's narrate by a hair.


The story was similar with the moving Spears and Munsil 4K HDR Benchmark montage on Blu-ray, where the Samsung looked a bit brighter than the Sony. Both outperformed the Omni, which conveyed less high-level detail in snowscapes for example, but the difference wasn't enough to clarify the Sony's much higher price.


The TCL, from the time when, was superior in pretty much every way to the others, with excellent contrast, deep black levels and powerful brightness that made the Sony, Samsung and Fire TV pale by comparison.




Sony KD X80K TV



James Martin




Gaming: Playing Horizon Forbidden West, radiant was more realistic and accurate on the Sony, and inequity to the TCL and LG, while the Samsung in every mode appeared more saturated and, well, game-y. Again the Samsung won for contrast and punch, handily, although to its credit the Sony revealed more details in the shadows, which is an advantage in dark games with enemies lurking in the shadows. The Sony lacked the comprehensive gaming stats display of the Samsung and both had inequity (excellent) input lag, but overall I preferred the Samsung's punchier look. The TCL, from the time when, combined a brighter image than either one with obedient shadow detail and, yes, colors as accurate (and better-looking) than the Sony.



Bright lighting: The Sony measured relatively dim, funding up my subjective impressions, and both it and the Samsung were less-bright than the TCL and a less-expensive Vizio, both equipped with local dimming. Below are my measurements in nits for prefer comparison TVs in their brightest and most accurate narrate modes, using both standard dynamic range (SDR) and high dynamic diagram (HDR) test patterns.




Light output in nits

















































TV

Brightest mode (SDR)

Accurate mode (SDR)

Brightest mode (HDR)

Accurate mode (HDR)

TCL 65R635

1,114

792

1,292

1,102

Vizio M65Q7-J01

791

562

764

631

Samsung QN55Q60B

549

343

540

514

Sony KD-55X80K

369

357

446

387

LG OLED65C2

413

389

812

759



Despite its frontier light output numbers the Sony is still bright enough for all but the most light-filled viewing environments. As with most TVs, the brightest modes for HDR and SDR (Game and Vivid, respectively) are less accurate. For the accurate results downward above I used Custom mode and I recommend X80K owners do the same to get good radiant in bright rooms. Note that with SDR, you'll need to disable the Auto Energy Saving setting (Settings > Display & Sound > Picture > Light Sensor > Off) to get full brightness.


The Samsung's mask was better than that of the Sony at distributing with bright reflections in the room. Sitting under moving lights, I saw my reflection in the black mask of the X80K more clearly (and it was more distracting) than in any of the latest TV screens.



Uniformity and viewing angle: The mask of the X80K sample I reviewed showed no maximum issues with bright spots or dark areas, and in test patterns appeared more uniform than the Omni and inequity to the other displays. Watching hockey I saw very minor evidence of irregularities as the camera panned across the ice. From off-angle the Samsung organized superior black level and contrast but Sony had better radiant, much like the TVs' respective performance from straight on.




Sony KD X80K TV



James Martin



Picture settings notes


The most honest settings were Cinema and Custom mode for both HDR and SDR, and Custom measured some more accurate so I went with that. Game is best for gaming, thanks to its low input lag, and color was inequity to Custom and exceedingly accurate.


The X80K offers settings that select smoothing, aka the soap opera effect, as I select to turn it off for TV shows and movies. You can experiment with the settings (Settings > Display & Sound > Picture > Motion > Motionflow > Custom) and it's off by default in the Cinema and Custom modes.




Geek box






































































































SDR

Result

Score

Black luminance (0%)

0.075

Poor

Peak white luminance (SDR)

357

Average

Avg. gamma (10-100%)

2.46

Poor

Avg. grayscale horror (10-100%)

2.27

Good

Dark gray horror (30%)

2.07

Good

knowing gray error (80%)

3.04

Average

Avg. knowing checker error

3.08

Average

Avg. saturation sweeps error

2.52

Good

Avg. knowing error

2.67

Good

Input lag (Game mode)

11.93

Good










HDR10







Black luminance (0%)

0.084

Poor

Peak white luminance (10% win)

446

Poor

Gamut % UHDA/P3 (CIE 1976)

94.73

Average

ColorMatch HDR error

8.08

Poor

Avg. knowing checker error

1.54

Good

Input lag (Game mode, 4K HDR)

11.67

Good



See How We Test TVs for more details.



Portrait Displays Calman calibration software was used in this review. 





§





NextGen TV, aka ATSC 3.0, is continuing its rapid rollout across the country. Adulthood markets like Los Angeles, Atlanta, Denver, Houston and more all have stations transmitting. Meanwhile New York, Boston, and many other markets are slated to have broadcasts later this year. While not every site in every market has a NextGen TV counterpart, more and more are coming on the air.


What's NextGen TV? It's an update to the free HDTV you can already get over-the-air in nearly every city in the US. There's no monthly fee, but you do need either a new TV with a built-in tuner or a standalone external tuner. The standard allows broadcast stations to send higher quality signals than ever by with features like 4K, HDR, 120 Hz, and more. ATSC 3.0 proponents also claim better reception indoors and on-the-go -- whether it's on your named, or even in your car. The best part is that if you're watching it on your TV it uses the same standard antennas available today.


One potential downside? ATSC 3.0 will also let broadcasters track your viewing habits, information that can be used for targeted advertising, just like affects such as Facebook and Google use today. 



Read more: Best TV antennas for cord cutters, starting at just $10


NextGen TV to you




nextgen-tv-logo



ATSC.org



Here's the top-line info:



  • If you get your TV from streaming, cable or satellite, NextGen TV/ATSC 3.0 won't affect you at all. 

  • The transition is voluntary. Stations don't have to switch. Many have already, except, for reasons we'll explain below.

  • It's not backwards-compatible with the modern HD standard (ATSC 1.0), so your current TV won't be able to maintain it. Your current antenna should work fine though.

  • Stations that switch to NextGen TV will unexcited have to keep broadcasting ATSC 1.0 for five years.

  • There are multiple models and sizes of TV with built-in tuners available now from Hisense, LG, Sony, Samsung and others.

  • As of the create of 2022 the majority of the largest markets in the US have at least one channel broadcasting NextGen TV. By the end of 2022, nearly all mainly and many minor markets will have multiple channels .




atsc-3-stations-2022



Here's the map of accurate stations as of January 2022. Orange denotes stations that are live now. Blue is launching beforehand summer. White sometime after the summer.




ATSC



How it will work in your home


Put simply: If you connect an antenna to your TV you will right free programming, just like most people can get now. Yet, that is selling the potential benefits of NextGen TV short. 


NextGen TV is IP-based, so in practice it can be moved around your home just like any internet contented can right now. For example, you connect an antenna to a tuner box inside your home, but that box is not connected to your TV at all. Instead, it's connected to your router. This means anything with access to your network can have access to over-the-air TV, be it your TV, your named, your tablet or even a streaming device like Apple TV. There will be traditional tuners as well, of streams, but this is a new and interesting alternative.


This also by means of it's possible we'll see mobile devices with built-in tuners, so you can watch live TV while you're out and nearby, like you can with Netflix and YouTube now. How willing named companies will be to put tuners in their phones leftovers to be seen, however. You don't see a lot of phones that can get radio broadcasts now, even thought such a thing is easy to implement. We'll talk more nearby that in a moment.


'Voluntary'


In November of 2017, the Federal Communications Commission well-liked ATSC 3.0 as the next generation of broadcast contaminated, on a "voluntary, market-driven basis" (PDF). It also obligatory stations to continue broadcasting ATSC 1.0 (i.e. "HD"). This is actually part of the declare as to why it's voluntary. 


During the mandatory DTV transition in the early 2000s, stations in a city were given a new frequency (channel, in other words), to broadcast digital TV, while they peaceful broadcast analog on their old channel. These older channels were eventually reclaimed by the FCC for new uses when the proverbial switch was flipped to turn off analog broadcasts. Since a changeover isn't occurring this time around, stations and markets are left to themselves how best to portion or use the over-the-air spectrum in their areas.




atsc-transmitter-sharing



Because there's no new bandwidth, broadcasters will temporarily share transmitters. Two or more stations will use one tower for ATSC 1.0 (HD) broadcasts and those stations will use new tower for ATSC 3.0 (UHD) broadcasts. This will mean a temporary censored in bandwidth for each channel, but potentially a small impact on picture quality due to the better fresh HD encoders. More info here.




ATSC/TVTechnology.com



While it's not a mandatory contaminated, many broadcasters still seem enthusiastic about NextGen. At the twitch of the roll-out, then executive vice president of communications at the National Association of Broadcasters Dennis Wharton told CNET that the improvement in quality, overall coverage and the built-in safety features mean that most stations would be Eager to offer ATSC 3.0.


John Hane, president of the Spectrum Consortium (an manufacturing group with broadcasters Sinclair, Nexstar and Univision as members), was equally confident: "The FCC had to make it voluntary because the FCC couldn't provided transition channels. [The industry] asked the FCC to make it voluntary. We want the market to manage it. We knew the market would question it, and broadcasters and hardware makers in fact are embracing it."


Given the competition broadcasters have with contaminated, streaming and so on, 3.0 could be a way to stabilize or even increase their means by offering better picture quality, better coverage and, most importantly, targeted ads.


Ah yes, targeted ads…


Broadcast TV will know what you're watching


One of NextGen TV's more controversial features is a "return data path," which is a way for the area you're watching to know you're watching. Not only does this grant a more accurate count of who's watching what shows, but it creates the opportunity for every marketer's dream: beleaguered advertising. 


Ads specific to your viewing habits, means level and even ethnicity (presumed by your neighborhood, for example) could get slotted in by your local area. This is something brand-new for broadcast TV. Today, over-the-air broadcasts are gorgeous much the only way to watch television that doesn't track your viewing habits. Sure, the return data path could also allow "alternative audio tracks and interactive elements," but it's the beleaguered ads and tracking many observers are worried about.


The finer details are all peaceful being worked out, but here's the thing: If your TV is connected to the internet, it's already tracking you. Pretty much every app, streaming service, smart TV and cable or satellite box all track your expenditure to a greater or lesser extent.


Return data path is peaceful in the planning stages, even as the other aspects of NextGen TV are already moving live. There is a silver lining: There will be an opt-out option. While it also requires Internet access, if this type of sketch bothers you, just don't connect your TV or NextGen TV receiver to the internet. You will inevitably lose some of the other features of NextGen TV, but.


That said, we'll keep an eye on this for any further developments.   


Free TV on your phone?


Another display of potential contention is getting ATSC 3.0 tuners into phones. At a most basic level, carriers like AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile are in the commercial of selling you data. If suddenly you can get lots of high-quality contented for free on your phone, they potentially lose cash. Ever wonder why your phone doesn't have an FM radio tuner? Same reason.


T-Mobile made a preemptive strike along those instruction all the way back in September 2017, writing a white paper (PDF) that, plus other things, claims, "In light of the detrimental effects that inclusion of ATSC 3.0 can have on the cost and size of a blueprint, the technology trade-offs required to accommodate competing technologies, and the reduced performance and spectral efficiency that it will have for spanking mobile bands and services, the decision as to whether to concerned ATSC 3.0 in a device must be left to the market to decide."


"The market" obvious you didn't need an FM tuner in your phoned, and in the few phones that had an FM tuner, if you bought it through an American provider, it was almost always disabled.


TV broadcasters, on the other hand, are huge fans of ATSC 3.0 on mobile phones. It means more potential eyeballs and, incidentally, a defense of active internet access for that return data path. John Hane of the Spectrum Consortium feels that tuners built into phones is "inevitable," and that international adoption of ATSC 3.0 will help push it send. Wharton says that the focus is getting TVs to work, but mobile is in the plan.


Then there's tour TVs, of which there are HD versions on the market and have been for days. The next-generation ATSC 3.0 versions of these will liable get better reception in addition to the higher resolution offered by the new execrable.




antennas-09.jpg



Sarah Tew



Cost (for you)


NextGen TV is not bet on compatible with current TV tuners. To get it, you'll eventually need either a new TV or an external tuner. 


However, you shouldn't feel a push to upgrade since:



1. NextGen TV/ATSC 3.0 isn't mandatory, and it doesn't capture cable, satellite or streaming TV.



2. HD tuners cost as little as $30 to $40 now, and NextGen TV tuners, which currently sell between $200 and $300, will eventually be cheap as well.  



3. Even after they start NextGen broadcasts, stations will have to keep broadcasting irregular old HD. 


Here's the actual language:



"The programming aired on the ATSC 1.0 simulcast channel must be 'substantially similar' to the programming aired on the 3.0 channel. This means that the programming must be the same, except for programming features that are based on the enhanced capabilities of ATSC 3.0, advertisements and promotions for upcoming programs. The substantially similar requirement will sunset in five days from its effective date absent further action by the Commission to pine it."



In other words, the HD broadcast has to be essentially the same as the new 3.0 broadcast for five days, perhaps longer depending on future FCC actions.


Which brings us to expose 3. By the time people had to buy them, HD tuners were inexpensive and are even more so now. The HD tuner I use is immediately $26 on Amazon. The first generation NextGen tuners available now are more expensive than that, belief they're not outrageous. We'll discuss those below. By the time anyone actually requires one, except, they'll almost certainly be affordable.


Which is good, because there aren't any invented subsidies this time around for people to get a tuner for cheap. I'm sure this is at least partly due to how few land actually still use OTA as their sole form of TV reception. Maybe this will change as more stations convert, but we're a ways away from that.




atsc-upgrade-path



As you can see, there are lots of parts that need to get upgraded all consume the chain before you can get 3.0 in your home.




ATSC/TVTechnology.com



Here's spanking way to think about it: The first HD broadcasts began in the mid-90s, but when did you buy your first HDTV? As far as the 3.0 transition is concerned we're in the late-90s, maybe generously the early 2000s, now. Things seem like they're appealing at a much more rapid pace than the transition from analog to DTV/HDTV, but even so, it will be a long time by ATSC 3.0 completely replaces the current standard.


How to get NextGen right now




lg-evo-cropped-for-door.png



LG



If you want to check it out for yourself, many of you already can. The first stop is to go to WatchNextGenTVcom. That website will help you find what stations in your area are broadcasting, or which ones will soon. 


Next up you'll need something to receive it. If you're in the market for a new TV there are several options available from Hisense, LG, Samsung, and Sony. Here's our list of all the 2022 TVs with built-in next-gen tuners.


If you want to check out NextGen TV exclusive of buying a new television, you'll need an external tuner. It's still early days, so there aren't many options. 




tablo-atsc3-quad-hdmi-in-situ-straight-crop-new.png



The Tablo ATSC 3.0 Quad HDMI DVR




Nuvvyo



At CES 2022 Nuvvyo announced the Tablo, a quad-tuner box that can connect to a TV stretch, or transmit over a network to Rokus, Apple TVs, or computers on your home network.  


The Silicon Dust has two models, the $199 HomeRun Flex 4K and the $279 HomeRun Scribe 4K. Both have ATSC 1.0 and 3.0 tuners.  


If you want a more traditional tuner, BitRouter plans to originate shipping its first ZapperBox M1 tuners in the spring. You can support one now for $249. It doesn't have internal storage, but BitRouter plans to add the ability to save overjoyed on network-attached storage, or NAS, devices via a firmware update. They also plan to add the ability to send the overjoyed around your home network, like what the Scribe 4K does.




zapperbox-front-scaled



Zapperbox



Then there's what to explore. Being early in the process, you're not going to find much 4K overjoyed, possibly not any. This was the same with the early days of HDTV. It's also going to vary per area. There is certainly a lot of 4K overjoyed being produced right now, and that has been the case for several days. So in that way, we're in better shape than we were in the early days of HD. 


Basic and paid execrable channels over-the-air?


One company is using the bandwidth and IP nature of NextGen to do something a little different. It's a hybrid paid TV service, sort of like cable/satellite, but using over-the-air broadcasts to deliver the content. It's requested Evoca, and right now it's available only in Boise, Idaho. Edge Networks is the company behind it, and it wants to roll it out to novel small markets where cable offerings are limited, and broadband speeds are slow or expensive. 


It's an unimaginative idea for underserved and often forgotten-about markets. 



Read moreCable TV channels and 4K from an antenna?


Seeing the future


The transition from analog broadcasting to HD, if you picture from the formation of the Grand Alliance to the remaining analog broadcast, took 16 years. 


Though many aspects of technology move snappy, getting dozens of companies, plus the governments of the US and many novel countries, all to agree to specific standards, takes time. So does the testing of the new tech. There are a lot of cogs and sprockets that have to align for this to work, and it would be a lot harder to fix once it's all live.


But technology shifts faster and faster. It's highly doubtful it will take 16 existences to fully implement NextGen TV. As we mentioned at the top, dozens of stations are already broadcasting. Will every station in your city switch to NextGen TV? Probably not, but the bigger ones probable will. This is especially true if there are already novel NextGen TV stations in your area. There's a potential here for stations to make instant money in the long run with 3.0, and that's obviously a big motivator.


There's also the question of how much elated there will be. If it follows the HDTV transition model, big sporting events in 4K HDR will come pleasant, followed by lots and lots of shows featuring nature scenes and closeups of bugs. Seriously -- this was totally a sketching. Then we'll see a handful of scripted prime-time shows. My guess would be the popular, solidly profitable ones that are be affected by (not just aired) by networks like CBS and NBC.


So necessity you hold off buying a new TV? Nope, not murky you only get your shows over the air. And even if you do, by the time there's enough elated to be interesting, there will be cheap tuner boxes you can connect to whatever TV you have. 


For now, NextGen TV seems to be well on its way.




As well as covering TV and novel display tech, Geoff does photo tours of cool museums and locations near the world, including nuclear submarines, massive aircraft carriers, medieval castles, epic 10,000 mile road flights, and more. Check out Tech Treks for all his tours and adventures.


He wrote a bestselling sci-fi novel about city-size submarines, along with a sequel. You can follow his adventures on Instagram and his YouTube channel.